Fulfilled in Jesus

In Jesus, “all the promises of God are Yea and Amen,” and the “Law and Prophets” find their fulfillment - Matthew 5:17-21.

Scroll Photo by Taylor Wilcox on Unsplash
 and Kingdom become prominent themes in Matthew’s gospel. With the arrival of the Messiah, the era of fulfillment had begun, and all the things anticipated in the “Law and Prophets” were coming to fruition. But what were the implications for the Mosaic Law? Fortunately, Jesus provided us with a clear answer - [Photo by Taylor Wilcox on Unsplash].

Christ did not come to adjudicate the interpretive disputes between competing Jewish sects over the details of the Law. His focus was not on how to keep the Law perfectly or whether it must be restored to some pristine state free of later traditions. Instead, Jesus summed up his mission as one fulfillment:
  • (Matthew 5:17-20) - “Do not think that I came to pull down the law or the prophets, I came not to pull down, but to fulfill. For verily I say to you until the heaven and the earth shall pass away, not one least letter or one point will pass away from the law till all be fulfilled. Whosoever, therefore, shall relax one of these commandments, even the least one, and teach men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of the heavens, but whosoever shall do and teach, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of the heavens. For I say to you, that unless your righteousness exceeds that of the Scribes and Pharisees, in nowise may you enter the kingdom of the heavens.”


The Pharisees kept the law scrupulously, having hedged it about with a myriad of oral traditions. As for the Sadducees, they rejected that “oral law,” insisting instead on adhering to what was written in the Torah itself with nothing added. But Jesus intended something beyond the arguments that raged between these sects.

His most consistent opponents were the Pharisees, not because he kept the law more scrupulously than they, but because of his looseness to some requirements of the Law as interpreted by the “traditions of the elder.” And if he had come simply to reaffirm the Torah as originally written, why did the Sadducees find it necessary to conspire to destroy him?

Certainly, Jesus did not come to dismantle the “law or the prophets.” And when he said this, he was referring to the entire body of the inspired writings that constituted the Hebrew Bible, and not just to the Torah itself.

In the New Testament, “law and the prophets” is a summary statement for all that God had revealed in the scriptures - (Matthew 7:12, 11:13, 22:40, Luke 16:16, Acts 13:15, Romans 3:21).

And Jesus proved later that he was no rigorist when it came to the minutiae of the legal code, especially in his attitude toward Sabbath-keeping and dietary restrictions. The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath, a perspective that the strict legalist would never endorse.


His claim that neither “one jot nor one tittle” of the Law would pass away was a colorful way of describing the unchangeable nature of the expressed will of God, for it represents both His will and nature.

However, that did not mean that God’s past revelations revealed everything about Him, or that it was His final word on every matter. And if it was His final and absolute word, why did He send His Son who brought new teachings that went even further than the statutes and regulations received by Moses?

Similarly, the author of Hebrews began his letter by stressing the supreme “word” of the Son, one that surpassed all previous “words” given in the prophets. In the past, God spoke “in many ways” and in “many parts,” but His final and decisive “word” was “spoken in His Son.”

The words “spoken in the prophets” were partial and preparatory but not final. The very fact that the Levitical system of priests and sacrifices proved incapable of “achieving the purification of sins” or cleansing anyone’s “conscience from dead works to serve the living God” demonstrated that the older legislation was provisional and incomplete.

And this change was anticipated by the prophets themselves when they predicted the coming “new covenant,” a covenant of a different order than the Mosaic legislation, one in which God would write His laws on the hearts of His people – (Jeremiah 31:31, Hebrews 8:6-13).


In the passage in Matthew, “fulfill” translates the Greek verb that has the sense “fill to the full, to make full, to fill up completely” (pléroō). And this is precisely the point and exactly what Jesus did – fulfill the Law AND the Prophets. Moreover, Matthew presents Jesus as nothing less than the fulfillment of what had been promised in the “law and the prophets.”

This understanding is borne out by the several antitheses that follow his declaration about the “law and prophets.” In each case, Jesus introduces a legal principle, then reinterprets it ON HIS OWN AUTHORITY. Each time he began his teaching with the emphatic Greek pronoun egō, or “I, myself…” - (Matthew 5:21, 5:27, 5:31, 5:33, 5:38, 5:43).

In doing this, Jesus went straight to the heart of each matter. For example, it is not enough simply not to kill. A disciple must abstain from hatred and anger, emotions that slip easily into violence and murder.

And the six antitheses provide real-life examples of what it means to have “righteousness that exceeds the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees,” and to see the “law and prophets” fulfilled in one’s life.

This is especially demonstrated in his explanation of how one “loves his neighbor as himself.” With their rigorist approach to the Law, the “Scribes and Pharisees” interpreted this as meaning they owed love only to their immediate “neighbor.” But Jesus expounded the true meaning by pointing to the nature of God Himself.

If He sends rain upon the just and the unjust, who are we to withhold love and mercy to our “enemies”? Above all else, it is by doing acts of kindness to our sworn “enemy” that we emulate God and become “perfect as He is.” Doing good to one’s “enemy” is the highest expression of the love commandment, and the ultimate expression of that divine statute was the sacrificial death of the Son of God who gave himself to reconcile men to God when they were yet his “enemies.”


In the messianic era, it is not conformance to the rigorous requirement of the Torah that determines entrance into the kingdom, but whether one obeys Christ’s words, including his interpretations of the Law, words that Jesus invested with ultimate authority:
  • Not every person that says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that does the will of my Father which is in heaven… whoever hears these sayings of mine and does them, I will liken him to a wise man, who built his house upon a rock; and the rain descended and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat upon that house; and it fell not, for it was founded upon a rock. And every person that hears these sayings of mine and does them not shall be likened to a foolish man, who built his house upon the sand; and the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat upon that house, and it fell; and great was the fall of it” (Matthew 7:22-27).

Even if the disciple rigorously avoids committing acts of murder and adultery, as stipulated in the Law, if he continues to harbor hatred or lust, he fails to keep the words of Jesus and may very well find himself rejected on the day when it matters the most. The standard of righteousness demanded by him goes far beyond anything found in the Torah.

The theme of fulfillment is threaded throughout Matthew. Most often, a citation formula is used to introduce a scriptural passage that has been fulfilled in Jesus, usually employing the verb “fulfill” (pléroō), and this understanding originated with Jesus himself:
  • (Matthew 3:15 - “It is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness.” Compare Matthew 1:22, 2:15, 4:14, 8:17, 12:16-21. Also, Luke 24:44 - “Everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the psalms must be fulfilled”).

Fulfillment does not mean the new revelation revealed by Jesus is unconnected with the old covenant, or that the Hebrew scriptures have been discarded. He came not “to pull down the law or the prophets, but to fulfill.”

Thus, what was germinal under the old covenant has come to fruition in the new one inaugurated by Jesus. In him, “all the promises of God are Yea, wherefore also through him, Amen.” He is “the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.” And he himself is the ultimate fulfillment of every “jot and tittle” found in the “law and prophets.”



On David's Throne

Two Women Restored